派遣報告書



氏名 井上 悠輔
長期/短期 長期
派遣先 スウェーデン・ウプサラ
Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB)

Biomedical Institute (BMC), Uppsala University

派遣期間 平成24年10月30日~平成24年12月31日
(平成24年10月30日~平成25年2月26日のうち)


成果報告書 
研究課題名 バイオリソース研究基盤の整備に関する欧州連合・スウェーデンの法制度研究

EU' s and Swedish regulatory frameworks for sustainable human bioresource management

One and a half months have passed since I arrived at Uppsala, Sweden.  CRB (Centrum för forsknings- & bioetik), at which I am working, is a laboratory for socio-humanistic scientific research activities, located in the Uppsala BMC (Biomedicinskt centrum), one of the central institute of European medical science. This center has published many works on regulatory ethics on biobanking, and this is why I selected this center.

As a social scientist, my works here, during this period, have been on mainly two topics. The first is an empirical and comparative legal study on the Nordic regulatory framework on the human bioresource handling. In Europe, some countries have played leading roles in introducing regulatory frameworks in this field. This is especially the case in Nordic countries. I identified some key laws which have worked as legal bases of regulating human bioresource management in these countries: Swedish Medicalcare Biobank Act in 2002, Norwegian Biobank Act (2003), and Finnish Tissue and Organ Act amendment in 2001. These laws are aimed to establish standard procedures of human biological sample collection and research usage, long term baking.

Recently these frameworks have been the matter of political discussion, and all countries have conducted legal reforms. Norway has amended legislation (2008) and, Finland has newly introduced the Biobank Act in 2012. I am studying this discussion from comparative regulatory points of view.

The second is on paper retractions, especially retractions due to “unethical research”.  The survey on retraction notices shows that there is an increasing tendency of these retractions to be published without enough information attached to them or a consensus regarding what information should accompany them or how to treat their “tainted data”.  As I have already done most of bibliometrical analysis, now I am preparing for writing a paper for submission.

Using next two months, I am planning to continue the comparative legal studies on 1st topics above, and will also launch a survey on research ethics education.

         

   

            Uppsala BMC                        Uppsala University

   (My centre is on the ground floor of this building)    



← BACK